nerds..

if (adam == stupid), then { susan.isGay = true; susan.getNoMoreRides = true; }
else { adam.isCool = true; }
—-Adam

“if input.NextLine == “change” then System.Console.WriteLine(”No!”)”
—-Me

12.如果找不到合适的人,你会永远单身吗?
ok im gonna be nerdy here.. F IMP F <=> T… oh noz
my later explanation since no one understood the joke implied:
12.如果找不到合适的人,你会永远单身吗?
substitute 你会永远单身吗 with A and 找不到合适的人 with B, the structure of that sentence is B => A (aka, B implies A)..
if we take a look at the truth table of implies, it should be (where => is implies and <=> is equivalent, T=true and F=false):
T => T <=> T
T => F <=> F
F => T <=> T
F => F <=> T
i evaluated A to be F, because i don’t think i’ll be single..and i evaluated B to be F, because again, i think i can find the right guy..
which means the final evaluation is T..
and then still no one got it.. so i gave up..
—-Me

assert( adam != stupid );
—-Adam

做數學就像追女孩,一要堅持,二要眼光獨到,三要有勇氣,四要基本功紮實!
—-丘成桐

Jenny:
i thought you only introduced yourself last week
– duo:
yea.. guys hit on me fast
im like a tlb
Jenny:
and the miss rate is too high XD
– duo:
cuz the page tables are tiny
rob:
ewww cs jokes
—-When we’re studying OS

duo: no not really
rúllie: yes, yes really
duo: no not really
rúllie: loop
duo: lol
duo: u shoulda said end loop
rúllie: end loop
rúllie: there i convicned you
duo: wah
duo: it ended with no not really
rúllie: but i ended with end loop
duo: yea and the last verdict before end loop is no not really
rúllie: fuk
—-When we’re debating

me: are you done os?
lu: yeah
me: cool
me: <3
lu: c>
me: wtf is that
lu: a more realistic version of heart
lu: since left and right chambers aren’t that clearly separated
me: wtf..
—-When we’re …flirting (as sad as that sounds)

me: if im a robot, would you still date me?
lu: mhmm
me: *hugs*
lu: not only will i date you, i will hack you and make you better
me: …
—-When we’re …flirting (as sad as that sounds)

Lu: i have this awesome feeling that windows 7 and snow leopard and starcraft 2 will be released together, or different by a month max
me: yea i want a new laptop
Lu: that’s like orgasm for the software industry
me: ew…
—-Jan 30, 2009

Lu: fractals?
Susan: yea
Lu: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_art
Susan: dont get it
Lu: it’s an expression of love towards beautiful math
Susan: yun
Lu: YUN WHAT!
Susan: ok now that sounds like jeremy
Lu: math IS beautiful!!!!
—-February 8, 2009

Lu: I noticed that I keep on getting cards that I wanted to have last round.
Susan: Oh really?
Lu: Yea, god’s response time is too slow!
—-April 4, 2009

Lu: well, no single compiler/parser accepts malformed syntax, why should IE
Susan: because ie is cool
ie is like the kid from the block who smokes cigs while other kids are chewing lollies
—-April 29, 2009 (At work, had to make IE and Firefox behave the same on some SharePoint Web controls, which made me pretty pissed off since there are always a gazillion ways to make IE work but not Firefox. Obviously malformed syntax isn’t one of them, but still.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *